Minnesota is on edge as Canada weighs potential retaliation against President Donald Trump’s tariff threats. The economic future of our border communities hangs in the balance.
The rapid shifts in tariff decisions have already sent shockwaves through the stock market , and a much bigger effect looms on regional economies. Canada’s 25% surcharge on electricity exports to Minnesota, Michigan, and New York, announced on March 9 and canceled a day later , illustrated the uncertainty. Trump’s decision to raise tariffs on Canadian steel to 50% on March 10, only to withdraw it hours later , added to the volatility.
The standoff, characterized by on-again, off-again, tit-for-tat decisions, represents a dangerous game of economic chicken, with neither side poised to emerge victorious. For the Northland, the stakes couldn't be higher as these unpredictable trade maneuvers directly threaten the stability of industries that have long been the backbone of the local economy.
Minnesota's relationship with Canada isn't just diplomatic; it's essential to residents' daily economic lives. In 2023, the state imported nearly $14.4 billion in goods from Canada while exporting over $7 billion northward. This trade relationship supports an estimated 167,000 to 175,000 Minnesota jobs.
The proposed 25% tariff on electricity exports would have hit consumers and businesses in the state with immediate higher energy costs . For energy-intensive industries in the Arrowhead region, including mining and manufacturing, such increased costs would force difficult decisions about production levels and employment. Many businesses in the Northland operate on thin margins. A significant spike in energy or input costs could force them to scale back shifts or worse.
The timing couldn't be more challenging as businesses still navigate post-pandemic supply-chain disruptions and inflation concerns. The uncertainty alone will likely cause companies to delay expansion plans and investments.
While electricity tariffs represented the most immediate threat, Canada's retaliatory measures to Trump’s tariffs that went into effect on March 4, extend far beyond the power grid. Agricultural exports, manufacturing components, and raw materials could all face retaliatory measures, creating a cascade effect throughout Minnesota's economy.
The Port of Duluth-Superior, which handles approximately 35 million tons of cargo annually, could see reduced traffic if cross-border trade diminishes. For a city whose identity and economy are intertwined with its status as a Great Lakes shipping hub, such reductions would affect port operations and the entire service economy built around it.
Proponents of tariffs often argue they protect domestic industries and workers. History suggests otherwise. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs of 1930 are widely believed to have deepened and prolonged the Great Depression. More recently, the 2018-19 trade tensions between the U.S. and China, and retaliatory measures, hurt American exporters.
ADVERTISEMENT
Tariffs create the illusion of economic protection while reducing overall economic efficiency. They may help specific industries in the short term but inevitably harm the broader economy.
Beyond macroeconomic indicators lie real human consequences. The Northland's border-adjacent economy means many families have personal and professional connections that span the international boundary. When politicians talk about trade wars, they are, in effect, talking about disrupting real lives, not just statistics.
Tourism, a vital economic sector for northern Minnesota, could suffer as higher costs and tensions between the model-friendly countries discourage Canadian visitors, who typically contribute significantly to local economies during summer months.
The current impasse demands thoughtful diplomacy rather than escalating rhetoric. Historical trade relationships between the U.S. and Canada have been the envy of the world — a model of mutually beneficial economic cooperation between sovereign nations.
Minnesota's congressional delegation would serve constituents well by advocating strongly for de-escalation. Sen. Amy Klobuchar has already called for renewed trade talks, emphasizing Minnesota's unique vulnerability in this dispute.
It is time that local leaders communicate the toll such measures could impose on their communities, ensuring that the president and his advisors consider the real-world consequences of their policy positions.
In international relations, as in business, stability and predictability create the conditions for prosperity . The current approach undermines both.
ADVERTISEMENT
Minnesota’s economic future is inextricably linked to that of its northern neighbor. The border region's forests, waters, and communities don't recognize political boundaries, nor do the economic realities that sustain the region’s prosperity.
In a potential trade war between the United States and Canada, there are no winners, only varying degrees of loss. For the sake of our communities, businesses, and shared future, we must chart a course toward cooperation rather than confrontation.
Bedassa Tadesse is a professor of economics at the University of Minnesota Duluth.
The Trust Project
